ABSTRACT
Background: Respiratory failure is a severe complication in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia that, in addition to oxygen therapy, may require continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) support. It has been postulated that COVID-19 lung injury may share some features with those observed in hyperoxic acute lung injury. Thus, a correct target arterial oxygen tension (P aO2 ) during oxygen supplementation may be crucial to protect the lung from further tissue damage. The aims of this study were: 1) to evaluate the effects of conservative oxygen supplementation during helmet CPAP therapy on mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission in patients with COVID-19 and respiratory failure, and 2) to evaluate the effect of conservative oxygen supplementation on new-onset organ failure and secondary pulmonary infections. Methods: This was a single-centre, historically controlled study of patients with severe respiratory failure due to COVID-19 pneumonia, receiving either conservative or nonconservative oxygen supplementation during helmet CPAP. A cohort receiving conservative oxygen supplementation was studied prospectively in which oxygen supplementation was administered with a target P aO2 <100â mmHg. Results of this cohort were compared with those of a cohort who had received liberal oxygen supplementation. Results: 71 patients were included in the conservative cohort and 75 in the nonconservative cohort. Mortality rate was lower in the conservative cohort (22.5% versus 62.7%; p<0.001). Rates of ICU admission and new-onset organ failure were lower in the conservative cohort (14.1% versus 37.3%; p=0.001 and 9.9% versus 45.3%; p<0.001, respectively). Conclusions: In patients with COVID-19 and severe respiratory failure, conservative oxygen supplementation during helmet CPAP was associated with improved survival, lower ICU admission rate and less new-onset organ failure.
ABSTRACT
Background Respiratory failure is a severe complication in COVID-19 pneumonia that, in addition to oxygen therapy, may require CPAP support. It has been postulated that COVID-19 lung injury may share some features with those observed in HALI. Thus, a correct target PaO2 during oxygen supplementation may be crucial to protect the lung from further tissue damage. Aims of the study were: 1) to evaluate the effects of conservative oxygen supplementation during Helmet CPAP therapy on mortality and ICU admission in patients with COVID-19 and respiratory failure;2) to evaluate the effect of conservative oxygen supplementation on new-onset organ failure and secondary pulmonary infections. Methods This was a single-center, historically controlled study of patients with severe respiratory failure due to COVID-19 pneumonia, receiving either conservative or non-conservative oxygen supplementation during Helmet CPAP. A cohort receiving conservative oxygen supplementation was studied prospectively in which oxygen supplementation was administered with a target PaO2<100 mmHg. Results of this cohort were compared with those of a cohort who had received liberal oxygen supplementation. Results Seventy-one patients were included in the conservative cohort and 75 in the non-conservative cohort. Mortality rate was lower in the conservative cohort (22.5% versus 62.7%, p<0.001). Rates of ICU admission and new-onset rate organ failure were lower in conservative cohort (14.1% versus 37.3%, p=0.001, and 9.9% versus 45.3% p<0.001, respectively). Conclusions In patients with COVID-19 and severe respiratory failure, conservative oxygen supplementation during Helmet CPAP was associated to improved survival, lower ICU admission rate and less new-onset organ failure.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Data on SARS-CoV-2 disease (COVID-19) in adult coeliac disease (CD) are lacking. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the epidemiology and clinical features of COVID-19 in adult coeliac patients regularly followed-up at our centre since January 2015. METHODS: Data about general health status and clinical features of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were prospectively collected over the phone. Data about CD were retrospectively collected from clinical notes. Prevalence and incidence of COVID-19 were compared between the coeliac cohort and the figures in the general population of Lombardy, Northern Italy between 20 February to 5 June 2020 provided by the Italian National Institute of Health (Istituto Superiore di Sanità) and the Lombardy regional government. RESULTS: Nine out of 324 patients contracted COVID-19, thus resulting in a prevalence of 2.78% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-4.58] and an incidence rate of 8.15/1000 person-month (95% CI 4.24-15.66). Prevalence of COVID-19 ascertained by means of nasal swab was 1.79% (95% CI 0.22-3.35) and the incidence rate 5.26/1000 person-month (95% CI 2.19-12.63), without difference from the general population. Clinical type of CD, age, sex, duration and adherence to a gluten-free diet, and mucosal healing did not differ between coeliac patients with and without COVID-19. None of the 9 patients with COVID-19 required hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Patients with CD do not seem to carry an increased risk of COVID-19 compared to the general population and their disease course is mild.